Pages

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Tropic Thunder

This weekend my husband and I went out to see the new comedy Tropic Thunder. There has been a good deal of controversy about this movie in disability rights circles, and many organizations, including the Special Olympics, have called for a boycott of the movie over its alleged inflammatory and derogatory use of the word "retarded." Yet, I admit it. I did it. In spite of the fact that I have an autistic son and a great deal of respect for the bloggers and organizations supporting the boycott, I broke the boycott and forked over my twenty-plus bucks for two tickets. (And I also admit that, as a people pleasing codie, I was reluctant to admit that.)

Why did I go anyway? Because the movie is a satire that also features Robert Downey Jr. in black face, which can be extremely offensive itself. I'm a huge fan of comedy that employs satire, sarcasm and irony, but I know these can be incredibly hard to pull of. (As I realize each time my own self-satire on this site goes unrecognized as humor and falls pathetically flat.) The reception of satirical humor depends a great deal on who the audience is, and I simply don't trust other people to interpret it for me, nor do I feel I can judge fairly from out of context snippets. (Um, and also, I really, truly love Jack Black and was so looking forward to this movie.) So, I decided to suspend judgment until I had seen the movie myself.

And after I saw it, I had some more thoughts on the controversy, but I also asked myself if the movie was worth seeing or not, independent of these issues? Well, not really. The movie did have some scenes that were quite funny. I was thinking of the Junky's Wife and laughing until I couldn't breathe during Jack Black's character's desperate attempts to get heroin. Robert Downey Jr. did a good job of handling the racially charged "n-word" and pulling off his his self-mocking use of black face. But Tropic Thunder wasn't wasn't consistently well done or consistently entertaining. It's not something you're going to quote for years or even remember for long after it leaves the theaters; it's a unevenly fun two hour distraction, much like Don't Mess with the Zohan.

But back to that controversy. What I found surprising was that the dialogue about disability that I found most deeply hurtful hasn't been mentioned in any of the press I've seen, which has focused exclusively on the use of the offensive word "retarded." I was disturbed by one quick scene in particular, in which agent Rick Peck (played by Matthew McConaughey) asks superstar Tugg Speedman (played by Ben Stiller) how Speedman's attempts to adopt a child are going. When Speedman tells him the adoption process has been fraught with complications, Peck looks at a picture of himself with a developmentally delayed middle-school-aged boy, who appears later in the movie wearing a bib, and says, "At least you get to pick yours."

Of course, I'm lifting Peck's line out of context, and you might think (as I would) that perhaps this was meant to mock Peck's character rather than his son. Sadly, no. The implication was that if one could choose to have one's own disabled child or another child free from disabilities, the wish would clearly be to have another child. But alas, those who have with children with disabilities are simply stuck with the unhappy burden of a despised and disappointing disabled child. And the movie did portray that view as one the audience ought to understand and sympathize with. One that should (but fortunately didn't, in our theater) bring a big laugh.

And that was what I found really awful. I know many parents of children with disabilities, different abilities or those quirky superpowers that just don't fit well in so many parts of this life. And we love our kids, fiercely. We love them in the face of those, like the makers of Tropic Thunder, who cruelly find them worthless and and think we ought to too. We love them, because we see them as the full and beautiful human beings they are.

So, I'm here to say that, on the whole, I love Ben Stiller, Jack Black, Robert Downey Jr. and their movies. And because I do, I went to see this one in spite of the negative press. But now, having seen the work as a whole, I do agree that the portrayal of people with disabilities in this movie is inflammatory and derogatory. Far from adding to the humor of the film, it detracted from my enjoyment. Tropic Thunder would have been a better and more consistently funny film if, among other things, the portrayal of disabilities was actually used as satire, rather than as cheap mocking or cartoon slapstick.

Skip Tropic Thunder because it's offensive or skip it because it's not a great film, but either way, my recommendation is to skip it. (Unless you're the Junky's Wife, in which case you should totally rent it to watch Jack Black offering blow jobs for heroin.)

8 comments:

  1. Addicted RantingsAug 17, 2008 09:31 AM
    Consider it skipped!!
    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll add that to the list of fat-hating movies and overtly misogynist movies that I'm never going to see.

    Having said that, I was rolling my eyes all week at the cries of "censorship!" aimed at the Shrivers and others who were promoting the boycott. This is capitalism, folks. That means that when we don't like something, we use our financial clout to make our opinions known. Censorship is something the government does, not something that private folks - even in groups - make happen on their own.
    ReplyDelete
  3. Your review is so well-written. It doesn't look like a movie I'd want to see anyway, so I'll definitely skip it.
    ReplyDelete
  4. It means a great deal to read your review of this movie. I hope it will help others make the choice not to see this movie because of it's content. The part you mention about adoption and 'choosing' made me feel physically ill. You are right, no one has discussed that.

    Thanks for putting all of it out there for us to read!
    ReplyDelete
  5. I probably won't see "Tropic Thunder" because, well, it sounds kind of stupid. That said, however, I might have laughed, at least a little, at that line. As I'm sure I've mentioned before, my brother is severely mentally ill and a frequent pain in my ass. My husband, on the other hand, has three brothers who, even when they're pains in his ass, are clever, funny, charming, and more or less at home in the world. And, yeah, there are times I've wished I could trade.

    I know a brother isn't the same as a child. I know mental illness isn't the same as autism or developmental disability. Still, I can't help but believe that many parents of children who have a hard time navigating the world must sometimes wish that something--their child, the world, maybe both--were different. Painful as that is, there has to be some way to laugh about it.
    ReplyDelete
  6. Good post, excellent focus on an occasionally mentioned but mostly overlooked item in the debate. For me the big insult is in the sneaky way Dreamworks attempted to blatantly use disabilities with their fake trailer, merchandise and marketing campaign for the cod 'Simple Jack' movie. So they pulled the offending promo material. It sickens me nonetheless to think that they will not apologise, answer or atone for that scummy behaviour.
    ReplyDelete
  7. woman.anonymous7Aug 21, 2008 02:03 PM
    Thanks for the review. We always go to the same movies. But I've been swamped for the last few weeks so I haven't made it to Tropic Thunder yet but now I can cross it off my list.

    Have missed reading your blog, glad to be back, love your new look!
    ReplyDelete
  8. Maybe I'm not observant enough, but I didn't get that out of the Rick Peck scene at all. I took it as his kid was just a sullen tween, not that he was developmentally delayed. I guess I need to watch it again and pay closer attention. But I wonder how many other folks saw it as I did instead of through the eyes of someone more sensitive to that type of disparaging content, you know?
    ReplyDelete