![]() | |
| Photo credit: Photo by Pikaluk on Flickr |
A little over a week ago, I posted about Alex Barton, an autistic kindergartener who was voted out of his class. Since then further reports have painted a more detailed picture of what happened in the classroom and Alex's teacher, Wendy Portillo, has spoken out to defend her actions.
On the morning of the incident, Alex was disrupting the class by lying under a table and pushing it up with his feet (a behavior my son's teachers and I are familiar with as well, although, needless to say, I at least, handle it differently). Alex was removed from the room and sent to the principal's office (and not for the first time that day). The "voting out" incident took place when he returned to the classroom. According to a report by the St. Lucie police, "Portillo said she did this as she felt that if (Alex) heard from his classmates how his behavior affected them that it would make a bigger difference to him, rather than just hearing it from adults."
In other words, this wasn't supposed to be an episode of Survivor, it was supposed to function more like an intervention.
Does understanding her intention change things? Not for me. I posted about the story only after, as I said, looking for compassion for her and trying to imagine some well-intentioned reasons why she might have done what she did. Yet, I couldn't think of anything that would mitigate my opinion that her attempt to use shame as a teaching tool -- however well intentioned or misguided -- had the effect of being cruel. And not just cruel to Alex, but cruel to the very children she was trying to help.
Ms. Portillo wanted to teach Alex to respect the needs of the other children, but in doing so, she was reinforcing several common societal misconceptions: about the nature of behavioral change, communication and yes, about respect for others.
Unfortunately, since each deserves a separate post, and I'm still recovering from both my trip and my virus, I'll save those thoughts until tomorrow...

11 comments: