Pages

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Literary Nerds on Prince Caspian

Last night, my husband and I went out to see Prince Caspian, the latest movie version of the Chronicles of Narnia. As the movie ended and the screechy wail of a song started over the closing credits, the audience began clapping, and I with them. I shook myself out of the spell that held me enthralled for 2 hours and 20 minutes and turned to Mark, who said, "BORING!"

"What?"

"That was so boring. But this song is good. I think it's my favorite part of the movie."

"Ugh! This song is making my skin crawl. It's that warbly, high pitched style that gets on my nerves. You really didn't like it? I thought it was the best movie we've seen so far."

"Really? I couldn't get into it. I could have walked out."

"Wow. I was totally entranced."

So, the movie got, um, mixed reviews, to say the least.

We determined that the problems stemmed, at least in part, from our relationship with the original books by C.S. Lewis. I was entranced with the books as a child, and as with Peter Pan and The Lord of the Rings trilogy, they formed the fabric of a fantasy world into which I escaped. In all three average people (children or those childlike in innocence) find magic and adventure; I used to dream of Pan knocking on my window or my closet suddenly opening on a wintry wood in another world or a wizard calling on me to become something extraordinary. If the Harry Potter books had been around then, no doubt I would have added waiting for an owl and an invitation to Hogwarts.

I reread The Chronicles of Narnia a few years ago, aloud to Mark. And the books were significantly less magical as an adult. I was shocked to find them downright offensive at times, in their underlying racism and particular Biblical interpretations: things that all went completely over my head as a child. Mark enjoyed The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, but by the end of the series was left with a bad feeling about the books in general.

The movie made several changes to the plot of Prince Caspian, which tightened it and made it much more exciting and compelling than the book for me. It also toned down (but didn't entirely eliminate) some of the Aryan superiority elements. (Am I the only one bothered by how the fantasy bad guys -- the Haradrim, the Telmarines -- are described as "dark skinned" and subscribe to some religious beliefs that seem to be taking digs at non-Christians?)

The movie was able to suck me in to that imaginary world of my childhood, rebuilt in even more vivid splendor than my imagination painted, with a plot that moved along briskly (especially compared to the book, which spends a significant amount of time following the Pevensie children as they search for food and trek lost through the woods). And I remembered little enough of the book (in spite of having read it only a few years ago) to remain in a state of uneasy suspense. I also appreciated the Shakespearean overtones the movie brought out: from Macbeth's defeat by the wood moving against him to Hamlet's quest for vengeance against his uncle.

Mark, meanwhile, was cringing, emotionally divorced from the characters, waiting for Aslan to show up and spew a moral message. Oh well. That's what I get for sharing the books.

8 comments:

  1. Velvet VerbosityMay 18, 2008 12:45 PM
    Dude, I haven't seen it yet, but I have a feeling this is exactly how it's going to go down if McS comes along.

    I totally related to the bond with the books. I didn't read Peter Pan as a child, but I was absolutely enthralled by the Narnia chronicles and The Lord of the Rings trilogy. I was just talking about how much they defined my childhood fantasies. Oh how I waited for the real magic to befall me.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, I used to wait for the magic too. I also used to wait for a car to pull up and for my "real" parents to claim me. Once during a hurricane I put my favorite toys in my sleeping bag and crawled in with them so that if I got swept to Oz, I wouldn't have to come back for anything.

    I can't wait to see the Caspian movie, but fear reading the books again for the reasons you mentioned.
    ReplyDelete
  3. I did not read the books, so my appreciation of the movie was not informed by any prior knowledge, other than the first movie.

    It was blah to me. I don't think I was that entertained, and I did not gain anything from it. Nothing connected or resonated with me.

    Some of the characters were very annoying this time around. What the heck was wrong with Peter and the monumental chip on his shoulder? And Prince Caspian? I was thoroughly unimpressed.

    The Christian imagery and worldview, whether it's toned down or not, still annoys me. Aslan coming in at the last minute to save everybody only because the little girl had faith in him? Lame. Are they supposed to rejoice and be grateful that he took his sweet time to come to their aid?
    ReplyDelete
  4. Like you, I adored the Narnia series as a child. It held such a magical, captivating world for me. My sister and I would forever pretend to be stumbling across the mystical entrance to Narnia, and take turns being different characters.

    And yet, when I reread The Lion, Witch & Wardrobe to my son, it definitely had lost something through my adult perspective.

    Reminds me of the book, (not the movie), The Polar Express.

    Had I lost my ability to hear the bell...?
    ReplyDelete
  5. Sunshine MorningstarMay 19, 2008 12:40 AM
    I think we're in agreement about Prince Caspian. I did enjoy the movie while watching it, but afterwards, I was thinking, "Well the first was so much better and I don't feel any urge to own this movie."
    ReplyDelete
  6. My husband and I will be the opposite. He'll love it. I'll be bored.
    ReplyDelete
  7. I took my youngest this past weekend - we loved it!
    ReplyDelete
  8. woman.anonymous7May 19, 2008 08:03 AM
    I am SO with you on the song! What were they thinking? I mean, come on! "It starts with a feeling..."??? With a chunk of cheese that big I feel they're obligated to provide wine or crackers!
    ReplyDelete