Pages

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Silda Spitzer's Message

This is also posted at Two Women Blogging

Photo credit: Photo by MotherPie on Flickr
I was driving to pick one of my kids up from school for a dental appointment when I caught the words "prostitution ring" (just those two words) on the car radio and turned up the volume to find out who the latest outed addict was. That's the free association of my mind these days: prostitution ring to sex addiction.

As the week of media frenzy wound on, I followed the coverage of Eliot Spitzer's fall from grace in the most idle way. I would read or listen to things if I happened upon them, but I didn't seek them out. I would overhear talk shows on the car radio: ten or fifteen minute segments on the way to or from my daughter's preschool. Sometimes I'd catch a news headline pushed at me online or overhear conversations or get e-mail from folks (who know nothing of my husband's addiction or this blog) wanting to speculate or criticize. Often I'd stop reading or listening or turn off the radio because it was too painful or infuriating. I'd breathe and center myself.

I get so frustrated with myself that I am in a state of progress and not perfection when it comes to being sucked back into craziness on occasion. And on this occasion, the craziness, the pain and anger, didn't come from the Spitzers. I'd read or listen, looking for their voices between the lines. I'd listen for my own voice, the voice of someone who had been there and knew. Instead, what I heard, for the most part, were the ones and zeros of people talking in binary from inside the Matrix.

The voices that made me tremble most in rage, even misguided as I knew them to be, were the voices criticizing Silda Spitzer. Yet I was, with a different sex scandal, in a different place in my life, one of those voices. As a strong woman and a feminist, I was outraged, just absolutely disdainful of Hillary Clinton when the whole Monica Lewinsky scandal broke. I wanted her to kick Bill in the crotch right in front of the press and send him to live on the streets while she got the White House. I was furious at Bill, furious at the image of men he represented, and I wanted that powerful woman, right there are the heart of things, to show him (and all men) that women would not stand by and quietly tolerate such behavior. And she did nothing, nothing except appear a little icier than usual. How I despised that woman. How could she betray women, betray me, that way? What kind of a message was that sending to men? To women? I certainly would never let my husband get away with that. (As if that were in my power.)

Some of my fury was born of fear, fear that men really are pigs and that the only way to control them is to let them know you're very serious about punishing them. It was born of not understanding my mother's life or choices. It was born of insecurity. It was born of not understanding what it really means to be strong or to be a feminist. The universe let me have my lesson a few years later when I found that my own husband is, like Bill Clinton (and Eliot Spitzer), a sex addict.

Needless to say, I don't see things quite the same way these days. I still feel rage (yes, yes, working on universal compassion, not there yet), but the target of that rage has changed. I see Silda Spitzer up on that stage, with the eyes of the world upon her, and I hear people say that they wish she weren't there or that she were visibly angry. I hear them say that she is sending the wrong message or that she's being used or that she should be thinking something different from whatever it is she's thinking. And I want to change myself into some avenging angel, covering Silda Spitzer gently with one great, silken wing while raining fire down on the press and fellow feminists and advice columnists and every possible incarnation of the old me. I want to shield and protect her, to heal her with whispers of the truth, and open the eyes of all the world with blazing pain.

Because here is how I see what happened to Silda Spitzer: There she was in the Governor's Mansion, maybe happy, maybe unhappy, who knows. What I do know is that she had a little pain or maybe just discomfort, a little twinge, let's say, in her arm. Some days it would hurt very much, some days she'd almost forget there was anything wrong. Maybe it never seemed serious enough to see a doctor about, or maybe she was afraid of doctors or what they might find.

Then one day someone walked up to her and shouted, "Good lord! Your arm is infected! It's rotting off your body!" And ripped her arm off her body and threw it to the floor. Now writhing in pain and shock, she's asked what she wants to do with the arm. A moment ago it was part of her body, part of herself, something essential to her life. The arm may have caused her problems and pain, it may be causing her pain now to see how infected the arm was, how close it was to killing her, how hideous and disfigured it had been without her ever noticing. Yet it was still her arm.

Now all the world looks at her and judges what she does next. (Bastards.)

What kind of message was Silda Spitzer sending? The message that she and Eliot Spitzer are human beings, in enormous pain, worthy of compassion, understanding and love.

What ought she to have done? Whatever, in that blinding pain and shock, she did was what she ought to have done.

If she had spit on and kicked that arm, or thrown that infected thing in the trash, I would have understood. And if she kicked Eliot Spitzer in the crotch at that press conference or walked off the stage or just not come at all, I would have said, "You go, girl. You do what you need to do right now." But if she cradled that arm for a moment and wondered if it could be reattached or healed or just buried properly, I would have understood that too. And when she did show up and walk away with Eliot Spitzer, hand in hand, I said (softly), "You go, girl. You do what you need to do right now."

16 comments:

  1. What "the public" expects of famous people has nothing to do with what's right for the famous people. It has to do with what "the public" needs or wants the famous people to represent, to act out for us. It's not Silda Spitzer's job to make us feel better. You are, as always, so right about this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm with you 100%. Marriage can survive this and then some. It's all a matter of character, commitment, and the one phrase: "In sickness and health, till death do us part."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Recovery DiscoveryMarch 29, 2008 10:43 AM

    I've been told recently that the question I need to keep at the forefront of my mind all the time is "what do I need to do to take good care of myself right now?" What I've recently decided is that all of the messages I feel compelled to share with others are things I need to tell me! Eloquently said, MPJ.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm conflicted about when a woman should leave and when she should stay. My grandmother stood by her third husband even after he abused my mother, and in the end he left her anyway (after embezzling some money and leaving her with his kids from his first marriage)...

    But mostly I think it is none of my business, not my life, and not my place to judge how another person chooses to deal with love and pain.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well said.

    ReplyDelete
  6. vicariousrisingMarch 29, 2008 1:24 PM

    I think part of the question in my mind is whether Silda did do what she needed to do or if she did what she thought she was supposed to do. We don't really know that.

    I feel terrible for her. I could never live my life in the public, nevermind when things go so bad. I wish her and her family peace.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another home run with this one!
    You speak with the voice of one who has been there, doubting and knowing in some small part of herself that things were not as they seemed, in pain, coming to terms with the truth of herself and her marriage, and compassion and acceptance, knowing were you stand and owning your truth.
    What a beautiful story you have woven here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I read somewhere a long time ago that Hillary ultimately followed her faith (maybe religion, maybe not) and that that it was that tat lead her to forgive her husband (yet one more time) and save her marriage and to what she had to do to keep her family in tact. What I read was a some friend of Hillary's supposition of what she was going through and how on a personal level she chose the path she chose.

    While my faith may tell me I would remove myself from that situation if it were mine, hers did not. And I leaned something about faith from that understanding. I learned that faith is always an individual's personal guide that should not have to bow to another's judgement (if that faith was not directly putting another in peril—think jihad). I learned that my ability to use my faith, such as it is, as a guide to do what is best for me is directly connected to my allowing others to lean on their own personal faith without judgment. And it is HARD not to judge the actions, choices and lives of others. For when another acts in a way I would not, it often serves to make me feel as if my actions are wrong. And I know better.

    Perhaps your post was not about the age old adage "Judge not lest ye be judged" (Matthew 7:1 thank you very much) but that's where it took me. As much as i believe that to be an extremely enlightened perspective, I never seem to be without a pocket full of stones at any given time and a propensity to throw them whenever I feel my own actions have been called into question. Thanks for bringing that to my attention even if inadvertently.

    WS

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh. Myfucking. G'd.

    I'm still tearing up. That was written with such beautiful and acute passion and intelligence.

    I bow to you, m'lady....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh, but then I also agree with Vicarious

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mary P Jones (MPJ)March 30, 2008 3:57 AM

    Several folks (Vicarious and Mantra on this blog and blue milk on Two Women Blogging) have commented that they wonder whether Silda Spitzer did do what she needed to do or if she did what she thought she was supposed to do. I truly believe that, either way, she did what she needed to do, but more on that today or tomorrow.

    No wonder the media beat the Spitzer to death -- this situation is a source of almost unlimited inspiration.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Worth waiting for, MPJ. If only this could be the benediction.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As always, you've taught me more about forgiveness, which is a true gift to me (having never known how or what it even means in my past)

    ReplyDelete
  14. I like your festering arm metaphor. That was fun.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Like you, I also didn't understand why Hillary stood by Bill when the shit hit the fan. I was very judgemental of her decision and also said "Oh, I would NEVER do that! Not me! Oh, no!". I was only 21 at the time, so I don't know how I felt in a position to judge other people's relationships...And then, of course, I went on to have a very abusive relationship of my own a couple of years later when I didn't leave when I should have. Ha!

    I do support a woman's decision to "stand by her man" (as long as that decision arises out of genuine love, and a desire to repair the damage done - and not just neediness and despair). However, I don't really understand why Silda had to stand on that little platform with Spitzer, giving him moral support.

    Did she really want to do that? Was it really necessary? Why couldn't she just have stayed at home that day, quietly tending to her own wounds? I can't help but feel that politics requires these women to be the sacrificial lambs on their husbands' fucked-up altars.

    If I was in Silda's position, I could probably imagine sticking by my man (maybe, maybe, maybe) but I just find it hard to believe that any woman would want to provide such a public display of support.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Came over here from Guilty Secret.

    This post really struck a cord with me. Thanks for making me feel more normal today. I appreciate it more than you know.

    ReplyDelete